# Hypergraph Motifs: Concepts, Algorithms, and Discoveries

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01853 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.01853/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Double-Scale Self-Supervised Hypergraph Learning for Group Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04200/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Hypergraph Neural Networks: An In-Depth and Step-By-Step Guide](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01039/) (2024)
- [Classification of Edge-dependent Labels of Nodes in Hypergraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03032/) (2023)
- [AHP: Learning to Negative Sample for Hyperedge Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06353/) (2022)
- [Ollivier-Ricci Curvature for Hypergraphs: A Unified Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12048/) (2022)
- [SINGA-Easy: An Easy-to-Use Framework for MultiModal Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.02572/) (2021)
- [VisualTextRank: Unsupervised Graph-based Content Extraction for Automating Ad Text to Image Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.02725/) (2021)
- [Text is NOT Enough: Integrating Visual Impressions into Open-domain Dialogue Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05778/) (2021)
- [Discovering Personalized Semantics for Soft Attributes in Recommender Systems using Concept Activation Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02830/) (2022)
- [Reinforced MOOCs Concept Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11011/) (2022)
- [Explanation-Guided Fairness Testing through Genetic Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.08335/) (2022)
- [Using Graph Neural Networks for Program Termination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14648/) (2022)
- [Tribe or Not? Critical Inspection of Group Differences Using TribalGram](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09664/) (2023)
- [MARIOH: Multiplicity-Aware Hypergraph Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00522/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Hypergraphs naturally represent group interactions, which are omnipresent in many domains: collaborations of researchers, co-purchases of items, joint interactions of proteins, to name a few. In this work, we propose tools for answering the following questions in a systematic manner: (Q1) what are structural design principles of real-world hypergraphs? (Q2) how can we compare local structures of hypergraphs of different sizes? (Q3) how can we identify domains which hypergraphs are from? We first define hypergraph motifs (h-motifs), which describe the connectivity patterns of three connected hyperedges. Then, we define the significance of each h-motif in a hypergraph as its occurrences relative to those in properly randomized hypergraphs. Lastly, we define the characteristic profile (CP) as the vector of the normalized significance of every h-motif. Regarding Q1, we find that h-motifs' occurrences in 11 real-world hypergraphs from 5 domains are clearly distinguished from those of randomized hypergraphs. In addition, we demonstrate that CPs capture local structural patterns unique to each domain, and thus comparing CPs of hypergraphs addresses Q2 and Q3. Our algorithmic contribution is to propose MoCHy, a family of parallel algorithms for counting h-motifs' occurrences in a hypergraph. We theoretically analyze their speed and accuracy, and we show empirically that the advanced approximate version MoCHy-A+ is up to 25X more accurate and 32X faster than the basic approximate and exact versions, respectively.