# Clinical Text Summarization with Syntax-Based Negation and Semantic Concept Identification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00353 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00353/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 29 Feb 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Improving the Factual Accuracy of Abstractive Clinical Text Summarization using Multi-Objective Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.00797/) (2022)
- [A Case Study on Pros and Cons of Regular Expression Detection and Dependency Parsing for Negation Extraction from German Medical Documents. Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09702/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the era of clinical information explosion, a good strategy for clinical text summarization is helpful to improve the clinical workflow. The ideal summarization strategy can preserve important information in the informative but less organized, ill-structured clinical narrative texts. Instead of using pure statistical learning approaches, which are difficult to interpret and explain, we utilized knowledge of computational linguistics with human experts-curated biomedical knowledge base to achieve the interpretable and meaningful clinical text summarization. Our research objective is to use the biomedical ontology with semantic information, and take the advantage from the language hierarchical structure, the constituency tree, in order to identify the correct clinical concepts and the corresponding negation information, which is critical for summarizing clinical concepts from narrative text. We achieved the clinically acceptable performance for both negation detection and concept identification, and the clinical concepts with common negated patterns can be identified and negated by the proposed method.