# Comparing (Empirical-Gramian-Based) Model Order Reduction Algorithms

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.12226 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12226/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Second-order AAA algorithms for structured data-driven modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02241/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, the empirical-Gramian-based model reduction methods: Empirical poor man's truncated balanced realization, empirical approximate balancing, empirical dominant subspaces, empirical balanced truncation, and empirical balanced gains are compared in a non-parametric and two parametric variants, via ten error measures: Approximate Lebesgue L0, L1, L2, L_∞, Hardy H2, H_∞, Hankel, Hilbert-Schmidt-Hankel, modified induced primal, and modified induced dual norms, for variants of the thermal block model reduction benchmark. This comparison is conducted via a new meta-measure for model reducibility called MORscore.
