# Author Name Disambiguation on Heterogeneous Information Network with Adversarial Representation Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09803 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09803/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Learning to Sample and Aggregate: Few-shot Reasoning over Temporal Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08654/) (2022)
- [RETE: Retrieval-Enhanced Temporal Event Forecasting on Unified Query Product Evolutionary Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06129/) (2022)
- [A Knowledge Graph Embeddings based Approach for Author Name Disambiguation using Literals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.09555/) (2022)
- [Mutually-paced Knowledge Distillation for Cross-lingual Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14898/) (2023)
- [Noisy Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Self-Training for Speculative Knowledge Graph Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07512/) (2023)
- [Incorporating Attributes and Multi-Scale Structures for Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13911/) (2025)
- [Cross-Source Reasoning-based Correction for Author Name Disambiguation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08617/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Author name ambiguity causes inadequacy and inconvenience in academic information retrieval, which raises the necessity of author name disambiguation (AND). Existing AND methods can be divided into two categories: the models focusing on content information to distinguish whether two papers are written by the same author, the models focusing on relation information to represent information as edges on the network and to quantify the similarity among papers. However, the former requires adequate labeled samples and informative negative samples, and are also ineffective in measuring the high-order connections among papers, while the latter needs complicated feature engineering or supervision to construct the network. We propose a novel generative adversarial framework to grow the two categories of models together: (i) the discriminative module distinguishes whether two papers are from the same author, and (ii) the generative module selects possibly homogeneous papers directly from the heterogeneous information network, which eliminates the complicated feature engineering. In such a way, the discriminative module guides the generative module to select homogeneous papers, and the generative module generates high-quality negative samples to train the discriminative module to make it aware of high-order connections among papers. Furthermore, a self-training strategy for the discriminative module and a random walk based generating algorithm are designed to make the training stable and efficient. Extensive experiments on two real-world AND benchmarks demonstrate that our model provides significant performance improvement over the state-of-the-art methods.
