# Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06278 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06278/

## Key facts

- Cited by 250 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 250)

- [Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10158/) (2023)
- [Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00725/) (2021)
- [OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.11104/) (2022)
- [Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulated](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02666/) (2021)
- [Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recourse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13620/) (2021)
- [CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00783/) (2021)
- [If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniques](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01035/) (2021)
- [Visibility into AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13138/) (2024)
- [Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01254/) (2022)
- [On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic Recourse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11313/) (2021)
- [Post-Hoc Explanations Fail to Achieve their Purpose in Adversarial Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.10295/) (2022)
- [Leveraging Explanations in Interactive Machine Learning: An Overview](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14526/) (2022)
- [Exploring Counterfactual Explanations Through the Lens of Adversarial Examples: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09992/) (2021)
- [Rethinking Explainability as a Dialogue: A Practitioner's Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01875/) (2022)
- [CLEAR: Generative Counterfactual Explanations on Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08443/) (2022)
- [Logic-Based Explainability in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00541/) (2022)
- [Towards the Unification and Robustness of Perturbation and Gradient Based Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.10618/) (2021)
- [A Review on Explainability in Multimodal Deep Neural Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07878/) (2021)
- [Local Explanations via Necessity and Sufficiency: Unifying Theory and Practice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14651/) (2021)
- [On Tackling Explanation Redundancy in Decision Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09971/) (2022)
- [Towards LLM-guided Causal Explainability for Black-box Text Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13340/) (2023)
- [Data-centric AI: Perspectives and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04819/) (2023)
- [From Statistical to Causal Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.00607/) (2022)
- [Fair Normalizing Flows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05937/) (2021)
- [Counterfactual Explanations in Sequential Decision Making Under Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02776/) (2021)
- [Anticipating Performativity by Predicting from Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07331/) (2022)
- [Optimal Counterfactual Explanations in Tree Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06631/) (2021)
- [On the Robustness of Sparse Counterfactual Explanations to Adverse Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.09051/) (2022)
- [DualCF: Efficient Model Extraction Attack from Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06504/) (2022)
- [On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Recourse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05427/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning is increasingly used to inform consequential decision-making (e.g., pre-trial bail and loan approval), it becomes important to explain how the system arrived at its decision, and also suggest actions to achieve a favorable decision. Counterfactual explanations -- "how the world would have (had) to be different for a desirable outcome to occur" -- aim to satisfy these criteria. Existing works have primarily focused on designing algorithms to obtain counterfactual explanations for a wide range of settings. However, one of the main objectives of "explanations as a means to help a data-subject act rather than merely understand" has been overlooked. In layman's terms, counterfactual explanations inform an individual where they need to get to, but not how to get there. In this work, we rely on causal reasoning to caution against the use of counterfactual explanations as a recommendable set of actions for recourse. Instead, we propose a shift of paradigm from recourse via nearest counterfactual explanations to recourse through minimal interventions, moving the focus from explanations to recommendations. Finally, we provide the reader with an extensive discussion on how to realistically achieve recourse beyond structural interventions.