# SLACC: Simion-based Language Agnostic Code Clones

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.03039 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.03039/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2020.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Predicting Patch Correctness Based on the Similarity of Failing Test Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13296/) (2021)
- [REINFOREST: Reinforcing Semantic Code Similarity for Cross-Lingual Code Search Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03843/) (2023)
- [On the Use of Deep Learning Models for Semantic Clone Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14739/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Successful cross-language clone detection could enable researchers and developers to create robust language migration tools, facilitate learning additional programming languages once one is mastered, and promote reuse of code snippets over a broader codebase. However, identifying cross-language clones presents special challenges to the clone detection problem. A lack of common underlying representation between arbitrary languages means detecting clones requires one of the following solutions: 1) a static analysis framework replicated across each targeted language with annotations matching language features across all languages, or 2) a dynamic analysis framework that detects clones based on runtime behavior. In this work, we demonstrate the feasibility of the latter solution, a dynamic analysis approach called SLACC for cross-language clone detection. Like prior clone detection techniques, we use input/output behavior to match clones, though we overcome limitations of prior work by amplifying the number of inputs and covering more data types; and as a result, achieve better clusters than prior attempts. Since clusters are generated based on input/output behavior, SLACC supports cross-language clone detection. As an added challenge, we target a static typed language, Java, and a dynamic typed language, Python. Compared to HitoshiIO, a recent clone detection tool for Java, SLACC retrieves 6 times as many clusters and has higher precision (86.7% vs. 30.7%). This is the first work to perform clone detection for dynamic typed languages (precision = 87.3%) and the first to perform clone detection across languages that lack a common underlying representation (precision = 94.1%). It provides a first step towards the larger goal of scalable language migration tools.
