# On Quantified Modal Theorem Proving for Modeling Ethics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.12959 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.12959/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Can AI Model the Complexities of Human Moral Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Kidney Allocation Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00940/) (2025)
- [AI Can Stop Mass Shootings, and More](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09343/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the last decade, formal logics have been used to model a wide range of ethical theories and principles with the goal of using these models within autonomous systems. Logics for modeling ethical theories, and their automated reasoners, have requirements that are different from modal logics used for other purposes, e.g. for temporal reasoning. Meeting these requirements necessitates investigation of new approaches for proof automation. Particularly, a quantified modal logic, the deontic cognitive event calculus (DCEC), has been used to model various versions of the doctrine of double effect, akrasia, and virtue ethics. Using a fragment of DCEC, we outline these distinct characteristics and present a sketches of an algorithm that can help with some aspects proof automation for DCEC.