# Transfer Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.12452 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.12452/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Deep representation learning: Fundamentals, Perspectives, Applications, and Open Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14732/) (2022)
- [CASPIANET++: A Multidimensional Channel-Spatial Asymmetric Attention Network with Noisy Student Curriculum Learning Paradigm for Brain Tumor Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.04099/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Gliomas are the most common malignant brain tumors that are treated with chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is used by radiotherapists to manually segment brain lesions and to observe their development throughout the therapy. The manual image segmentation process is time-consuming and results tend to vary among different human raters. Therefore, there is a substantial demand for automatic image segmentation algorithms that produce a reliable and accurate segmentation of various brain tissue types. Recent advances in deep learning have led to convolutional neural network architectures that excel at various visual recognition tasks. They have been successfully applied to the medical context including medical image segmentation. In particular, fully convolutional networks (FCNs) such as the U-Net produce state-of-the-art results in the automatic segmentation of brain tumors. MRI brain scans are volumetric and exist in various co-registered modalities that serve as input channels for these FCN architectures. Training algorithms for brain tumor segmentation on this complex input requires large amounts of computational resources and is prone to overfitting. In this work, we construct FCNs with pretrained convolutional encoders. We show that we can stabilize the training process this way and achieve an improvement with respect to dice scores and Hausdorff distances. We also test our method on a privately obtained clinical dataset.
