# Pairwise Neural Machine Translation Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03135 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03135/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Translation Quality Assessment: A Brief Survey on Manual and Automatic Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.03311/) (2021)
- [Towards Automated Document Revision: Grammatical Error Correction, Fluency Edits, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11484/) (2022)
- [MT-Ranker: Reference-free machine translation evaluation by inter-system ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17099/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04694/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Human Evaluation in Machine Translation with Comparative Judgment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17797/) (2025)
- [An Overview on Machine Translation Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11027/) (2022)
- [Learning to Compare Hardware Designs for High-Level Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13138/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Natural Language Generation Advances from the Perspective of Digital Deception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.05757/) (2022)
- [PEAR: Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring in Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18006/) (2026)
- [SUper Team at SemEval-2016 Task 3: Building a feature-rich system for community question answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.15120/) (2021)
- [Trained MT Metrics Learn to Cope with Machine-translated References](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00536/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a novel framework for machine translation evaluation using neural networks in a pairwise setting, where the goal is to select the better translation from a pair of hypotheses, given the reference translation. In this framework, lexical, syntactic and semantic information from the reference and the two hypotheses is compacted into relatively small distributed vector representations, and fed into a multi-layer neural network that models the interaction between each of the hypotheses and the reference, as well as between the two hypotheses. These compact representations are in turn based on word and sentence embeddings, which are learned using neural networks. The framework is flexible, allows for efficient learning and classification, and yields correlation with humans that rivals the state of the art.
