# Analysis of Deep Networks for Monocular Depth Estimation Through Adversarial Attacks with Proposal of a Defense Method

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08790 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08790/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Deep Depth Completion from Extremely Sparse Data: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.05335/) (2022)
- [Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13487/) (2023)
- [Boosting Light-Weight Depth Estimation Via Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.06143/) (2021)
- [Distracting Downpour: Adversarial Weather Attacks for Motion Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06716/) (2023)
- [Self-supervised Adversarial Training of Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05857/) (2024)
- [Dense Depth Distillation with Out-of-Distribution Simulated Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12464/) (2022)
- [Surround-View Cameras based Holistic Visual Perception for Automated Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05542/) (2022)
- [Lifelong-MonoDepth: Lifelong Learning for Multi-Domain Monocular Metric Depth Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05050/) (2023)
- [BadDepth: Backdoor Attacks Against Monocular Depth Estimation in the Physical World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16154/) (2025)
- [DepthVanish: Optimizing Adversarial Interval Structures for Stereo-Depth-Invisible Patches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.16690/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we consider adversarial attacks against a system of monocular depth estimation (MDE) based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The motivation is two-fold. One is to study the security of MDE systems, which has not been actively considered in the community. The other is to improve our understanding of the computational mechanism of CNNs performing MDE. Toward this end, we apply the method recently proposed for visualization of MDE to defending attacks. It trains another CNN to predict a saliency map from an input image, such that the CNN for MDE continues to accurately estimate the depth map from the image with its non-salient part masked out. We report the following findings. First, unsurprisingly, attacks by IFGSM (or equivalently PGD) succeed in making the CNNs yield inaccurate depth estimates. Second, the attacks can be defended by masking out non-salient pixels, indicating that the attacks function by perturbing mostly non-salient pixels. However, the prediction of saliency maps is itself vulnerable to the attacks, even though it is not the direct target of the attacks. We show that the attacks can be defended by using a saliency map predicted by a CNN trained to be robust to the attacks. These results provide an effective defense method as well as a clue to understanding the computational mechanism of CNNs for MDE.
