# Posing Fair Generalization Tasks for Natural Language Inference

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.00811 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00811/

## Key facts

- Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Causal Abstractions of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02997/) (2021)
- [Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02536/) (2023)
- [Inducing Causal Structure for Interpretable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00826/) (2021)
- [State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03050/) (2022)
- [QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.12708/) (2021)
- [Changing the World by Changing the Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13947/) (2021)
- [Improving Selective Visual Question Answering by Learning from Your Peers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08751/) (2023)
- [ReCOGS: How Incidental Details of a Logical Form Overshadow an Evaluation of Semantic Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13716/) (2023)
- [GOLD: Improving Out-of-Scope Detection in Dialogues using Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.03079/) (2021)
- [Uncertainty-aware Language Modeling for Selective Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15451/) (2023)
- [Exploring Transitivity in Neural NLI Models through Veridicality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.10713/) (2021)
- [Operationalising Representation in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08193/) (2023)
- [Neuro-symbolic Natural Logic with Introspective Revision for Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04857/) (2022)
- [Benchmarking Long-tail Generalization with Likelihood Splits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06799/) (2022)
- [Generalized Quantifiers as a Source of Error in Multilingual NLU Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10615/) (2022)
- [Estimating the Causal Effects of Natural Logic Features in Neural NLI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08572/) (2023)
- [Introducing Diminutive Causal Structure into Graph Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08709/) (2024)
- [Concepts, Properties and an Approach for Compositional Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04225/) (2021)
- [A Short Survey of Systematic Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11956/) (2022)
- [Introducing Expertise Logic into Graph Representation Learning from A Causal Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08496/) (2023)
- [Estimating the Causal Effects of Natural Logic Features in Transformer-Based NLI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02622/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Adjective-Noun Compositionality in LLMs: Functional vs Representational Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09994/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models for semantics are generally evaluated using naturalistic corpora. Adversarial methods, in which models are evaluated on new examples with known semantic properties, have begun to reveal that good performance at these naturalistic tasks can hide serious shortcomings. However, we should insist that these evaluations be fair -that the models are given data sufficient to support the requisite kinds of generalization. In this paper, we define and motivate a formal notion of fairness in this sense. We then apply these ideas to natural language inference by constructing very challenging but provably fair artificial datasets and showing that standard neural models fail to generalize in the required ways; only task-specific models that jointly compose the premise and hypothesis are able to achieve high performance, and even these models do not solve the task perfectly.
