# A Classification Framework for Stablecoin Designs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10098 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10098/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [The Design Principle of Blockchain: An Initiative for the SoK of SoKs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00479/) (2023)
- [Data Depth and Core-based Trend Detection on Blockchain Transaction Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14241/) (2023)
- [Investigating Similarities Across Decentralized Financial (DeFi) Services](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00034/) (2024)
- [Scalable Data Point Valuation in Decentralized Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01657/) (2023)
- [Leveraging Large Language Models to Bridge Cross-Domain Transparency in Stablecoins](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02418/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Stablecoins promise to bridge fiat currencies with the world of cryptocurrencies. They provide a way for users to take advantage of the benefits of digital currencies, such as ability to transfer assets over the internet, provide assurance on minting schedules and scarcity, and enable new asset classes, while also partially mitigating their volatility risks. In this paper, we systematically discuss general design, decompose existing stablecoins into various component design elements, explore their strengths and drawbacks, and identify future directions.