# How Additional Knowledge can Improve Natural Language Commonsense Question Answering?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.08855 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08855/

## Key facts

- Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08387/) (2021)
- [The Web Is Your Oyster - Knowledge-Intensive NLP against a Very Large Web Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09924/) (2021)
- [NormBank: A Knowledge Bank of Situational Social Norms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17008/) (2023)
- [Rainier: Reinforced Knowledge Introspector for Commonsense Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03078/) (2022)
- [Human Parity on CommonsenseQA: Augmenting Self-Attention with External Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03254/) (2021)
- [Kformer: Knowledge Injection in Transformer Feed-Forward Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05742/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07399/) (2023)
- [Logical Reasoning over Natural Language as Knowledge Representation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12023/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Knowledge-Intensive NLP with Pre-Trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08772/) (2022)
- [Incorporating Commonsense Knowledge Graph in Pretrained Models for Social Commonsense Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05457/) (2021)
- [Self-Supervised Test-Time Learning for Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11263/) (2021)
- [Self-Consistent Narrative Prompts on Abductive Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08303/) (2023)
- [Embarrassingly Simple Performance Prediction for Abductive Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.10408/) (2022)
- [Inside ASCENT: Exploring a Deep Commonsense Knowledge Base and its Usage in Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13662/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Knowledge-Enhanced Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.13428/) (2022)
- [Semantic Categorization of Social Knowledge for Commonsense Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05168/) (2021)
- [A Theoretically Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Commonsense](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12184/) (2022)
- [Synergizing Machine Learning & Symbolic Methods: A Survey on Hybrid Approaches to Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11972/) (2024)
- [Rule or Story, Which is a Better Commonsense Expression for Talking with Large Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14355/) (2024)
- [Zero-shot Commonsense Reasoning over Machine Imagination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09329/) (2024)
- [Go Beyond Plain Fine-tuning: Improving Pretrained Models for Social Commonsense](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05913/) (2021)
- [Enhancing Zero-shot Commonsense Reasoning by Integrating Visual Knowledge via Machine Imagination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05040/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recently several datasets have been proposed to encourage research in Question Answering domains where commonsense knowledge is expected to play an important role. Recent language models such as ROBERTA, BERT and GPT that have been pre-trained on Wikipedia articles and books have shown reasonable performance with little fine-tuning on several such Multiple Choice Question-Answering (MCQ) datasets. Our goal in this work is to develop methods to incorporate additional (commonsense) knowledge into language model-based approaches for better question-answering in such domains. In this work, we first categorize external knowledge sources, and show performance does improve on using such sources. We then explore three different strategies for knowledge incorporation and four different models for question-answering using external commonsense knowledge. We analyze our predictions to explore the scope of further improvements.
