# Benchmarking the Performance and Energy Efficiency of AI Accelerators for AI Training

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06842 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06842/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Training Large Language Models Efficiently with Sparsity and Dataflow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05511/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning has become widely used in complex AI applications. Yet, training a deep neural network (DNNs) model requires a considerable amount of calculations, long running time, and much energy. Nowadays, many-core AI accelerators (e.g., GPUs and TPUs) are designed to improve the performance of AI training. However, processors from different vendors perform dissimilarly in terms of performance and energy consumption. To investigate the differences among several popular off-the-shelf processors (i.e., Intel CPU, NVIDIA GPU, AMD GPU, and Google TPU) in training DNNs, we carry out a comprehensive empirical study on the performance and energy efficiency of these processors by benchmarking a representative set of deep learning workloads, including computation-intensive operations, classical convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (LSTM), Deep Speech 2, and Transformer. Different from the existing end-to-end benchmarks which only present the training time, We try to investigate the impact of hardware, vendor's software library, and deep learning framework on the performance and energy consumption of AI training. Our evaluation methods and results not only provide an informative guide for end-users to select proper AI accelerators, but also expose some opportunities for the hardware vendors to improve their software library.