# Parallel fault-tolerant programming of an arbitrary feedforward photonic network

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06179 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06179/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Experimentally realized in situ backpropagation for deep learning in nanophotonic neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.08501/) (2022)
- [Low-rank surrogate modeling and stochastic zero-order optimization for training of neural networks with black-box layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.15113/) (2025)
- [Local learning for stable backpropagation-free neural network training towards physical learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24790/) (2026)
- [LuxIA: A Lightweight Unitary matriX-based Framework Built on an Iterative Algorithm for Photonic Neural Network Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22264/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reconfigurable photonic mesh networks of tunable beamsplitter nodes can linearly transform N-dimensional vectors representing input modal amplitudes of light for applications such as energy-efficient machine learning hardware, quantum information processing, and mode demultiplexing. Such photonic meshes are typically programmed and/or calibrated by tuning or characterizing each beam splitter one-by-one, which can be time-consuming and can limit scaling to larger meshes. Here we introduce a graph-topological approach that defines the general class of feedforward networks commonly used in such applications and identifies columns of non-interacting nodes that can be adjusted simultaneously. By virtue of this approach, we can calculate the necessary input vectors to program entire columns of nodes in parallel by simultaneously nullifying the power in one output of each node via optoelectronic feedback onto adjustable phase shifters or couplers. This parallel nullification approach is fault-tolerant to fabrication errors, requiring no prior knowledge or calibration of the node parameters, and can reduce the programming time by a factor of order N to being proportional to the optical depth (or number of node columns in the device). As a demonstration, we simulate our programming protocol on a feedforward optical neural network model trained to classify handwritten digit images from the MNIST dataset with up to 98% validation accuracy.
