# Double Robustness for Complier Parameters and a Semiparametric Test for Complier Characteristics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.05244 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05244/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Augmented balancing weights as linear regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14545/) (2023)
- [Estimating individual treatment effects under unobserved confounding using binary instruments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.08544/) (2022)
- [Nonparametric Heterogeneous Long-term Causal Effect Estimation via Data Combination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18960/) (2025)
- [Long-term Causal Inference via Modeling Sequential Latent Confounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18994/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a semiparametric test to evaluate (i) whether different instruments induce subpopulations of compliers with the same observable characteristics on average, and (ii) whether compliers have observable characteristics that are the same as the full population on average. The test is a flexible robustness check for the external validity of instruments. We use it to reinterpret the difference in LATE estimates that Angrist and Evans (1998) obtain when using different instrumental variables. To justify the test, we characterize the doubly robust moment for Abadie (2003)'s class of complier parameters, and we analyze a machine learning update to kappa weighting.
