# Towards Understanding Neural Machine Translation with Word Importance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00326 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00326/

## Key facts

- Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13942/) (2023)
- [Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation via Model Introspection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07779/) (2023)
- [On Compositional Generalization of Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14802/) (2021)
- [Local Interpretations for Explainable Natural Language Processing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11072/) (2021)
- [Are Character-level Translations Worth the Wait? Comparing ByT5 and mT5 for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14220/) (2023)
- [Attention Weights in Transformer NMT Fail Aligning Words Between Sequences but Largely Explain Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05853/) (2021)
- [Explainability in Practice: A Survey of Explainable NLP Across Various Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00837/) (2025)
- [Interpretation of Black Box NLP Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.17081/) (2022)
- [State Spaces Aren't Enough: Machine Translation Needs Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12776/) (2023)
- [Explicit Syntactic Guidance for Neural Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11485/) (2023)
- [Perturbation-based QE: An Explainable, Unsupervised Word-level Quality Estimation Method for Blackbox Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07457/) (2023)
- [Bilingual Mutual Information Based Adaptive Training for Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12523/) (2021)
- [Font Shape-to-Impression Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05808/) (2022)
- [On Neurons Invariant to Sentence Structural Changes in Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03067/) (2021)
- [Predicting Human Translation Difficulty with Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11852/) (2023)
- [PEACH: Pretrained-embedding Explanation Across Contextual and Hierarchical Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13645/) (2024)
- [Nano-EmoX: Unifying Multimodal Emotional Intelligence from Perception to Empathy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02123/) (2026)
- [The Role of Handling Attributive Nouns in Improving Chinese-To-English Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14323/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Explainable AI Attribution Methods in Neural Machine Translation via Attention-Guided Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11342/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Although neural machine translation (NMT) has advanced the state-of-the-art on various language pairs, the interpretability of NMT remains unsatisfactory. In this work, we propose to address this gap by focusing on understanding the input-output behavior of NMT models. Specifically, we measure the word importance by attributing the NMT output to every input word through a gradient-based method. We validate the approach on a couple of perturbation operations, language pairs, and model architectures, demonstrating its superiority on identifying input words with higher influence on translation performance. Encouragingly, the calculated importance can serve as indicators of input words that are under-translated by NMT models. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that words of certain syntactic categories have higher importance while the categories vary across language pairs, which can inspire better design principles of NMT architectures for multi-lingual translation.
