# Data Management for Causal Algorithmic Fairness

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.07924 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07924/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [OTClean: Data Cleaning for Conditional Independence Violations using Optimal Transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02372/) (2024)
- [Fragments to Facts: Partial-Information Fragment Inference from LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13819/) (2025)
- [The Fair Game: Auditing & Debiasing AI Algorithms Over Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06443/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness is increasingly recognized as a critical component of machine learning systems. However, it is the underlying data on which these systems are trained that often reflects discrimination, suggesting a data management problem. In this paper, we first make a distinction between associational and causal definitions of fairness in the literature and argue that the concept of fairness requires causal reasoning. We then review existing works and identify future opportunities for applying data management techniques to causal algorithmic fairness.
