# Dataset Growth in Medical Image Analysis Research

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.07765 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07765/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [SegRap2023: A Benchmark of Organs-at-Risk and Gross Tumor Volume Segmentation for Radiotherapy Planning of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09576/) (2023)
- [Self-Supervised Pre-Training with Contrastive and Masked Autoencoder Methods for Dealing with Small Datasets in Deep Learning for Medical Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06534/) (2023)
- [CyTran: A Cycle-Consistent Transformer with Multi-Level Consistency for Non-Contrast to Contrast CT Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06400/) (2021)
- [Metadata-enhanced contrastive learning from retinal optical coherence tomography images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.02529/) (2022)
- [When to Forget? Complexity Trade-offs in Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17323/) (2025)
- [Investigating the Quality of DermaMNIST and Fitzpatrick17k Dermatological Image Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14497/) (2024)
- [Region-based Contrastive Pretraining for Medical Image Retrieval with Anatomic Query](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05598/) (2023)
- [High performing ensemble of convolutional neural networks for insect pest image detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.12539/) (2021)
- [M(otion)-mode Based Prediction of Ejection Fraction using Echocardiograms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03759/) (2023)
- [ROFI: A Deep Learning-Based Ophthalmic Sign-Preserving and Reversible Patient Face Anonymizer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11073/) (2025)
- [Optimizing the Procedure of CT Segmentation Labeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14089/) (2023)
- [Towards Resource-Efficient Streaming of Large-Scale Medical Image Datasets for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00438/) (2023)
- [Bringing together invertible UNets with invertible attention modules for memory-efficient diffusion models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10883/) (2025)
- [CP-Dilatation: A Copy-and-Paste Augmentation Method for Preserving the Boundary Context Information of Histopathology Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04660/) (2025)
- [Clinical Uncertainty Impacts Machine Learning Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22242/) (2025)
- [MedROI: Codec-Agnostic Region of Interest-Centric Compression for Medical Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.04511/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Medical image analysis studies usually require medical image datasets for training, testing and validation of algorithms. The need is underscored by the deep learning revolution and the dominance of machine learning in recent medical image analysis research. Nevertheless, due to ethical and legal constraints, commercial conflicts and the dependence on busy medical professionals, medical image analysis researchers have been described as "data starved". Due to the lack of objective criteria for sufficiency of dataset size, the research community implicitly sets ad-hoc standards by means of the peer review process. We hypothesize that peer review requires researchers to report the use of ever-increasing datasets as one condition for acceptance of their work to reputable publication venues. To test this hypothesis, we scanned the proceedings of the eminent MICCAI (Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention) conferences from 2011 to 2018. From a total of 2136 articles, we focused on 907 papers involving human datasets of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), CT (Computed Tomography) and fMRI (functional MRI) images. For each modality, for each of the years 2011-2018 we calculated the average, geometric mean and median number of human subjects used in that year's MICCAI articles. The results corroborate the dataset growth hypothesis. Specifically, the annual median dataset size in MICCAI articles has grown roughly 3-10 times from 2011 to 2018, depending on the imaging modality. Statistical analysis further supports the dataset growth hypothesis and reveals exponential growth of the geometric mean dataset size, with annual growth of about 21% for MRI, 24% for CT and 31% for fMRI. In slight analogy to Moore's law, the results can provide guidance about trends in the expectations of the medical image analysis community regarding dataset size.