# Surrogate Models for Enhancing the Efficiency of Neuroevolution in Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09300 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.09300/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Derivative-Free Reinforcement Learning: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05710/) (2021)
- [Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning: A Systematic Review and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13296/) (2024)
- [Behavior-based Neuroevolutionary Training in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07960/) (2021)
- [Zero-Shot LLMs in Human-in-the-Loop RL: Replacing Human Feedback for Reward Shaping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22723/) (2025)
- [Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning Based on Autoencoder and Hyperbolic Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19423/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the last years, reinforcement learning received a lot of attention. One method to solve reinforcement learning tasks is Neuroevolution, where neural networks are optimized by evolutionary algorithms. A disadvantage of Neuroevolution is that it can require numerous function evaluations, while not fully utilizing the available information from each fitness evaluation. This is especially problematic when fitness evaluations become expensive. To reduce the cost of fitness evaluations, surrogate models can be employed to partially replace the fitness function. The difficulty of surrogate modeling for Neuroevolution is the complex search space and how to compare different networks. To that end, recent studies showed that a kernel based approach, particular with phenotypic distance measures, works well. These kernels compare different networks via their behavior (phenotype) rather than their topology or encoding (genotype). In this work, we discuss the use of surrogate model-based Neuroevolution (SMB-NE) using a phenotypic distance for reinforcement learning. In detail, we investigate a) the potential of SMB-NE with respect to evaluation efficiency and b) how to select adequate input sets for the phenotypic distance measure in a reinforcement learning problem. The results indicate that we are able to considerably increase the evaluation efficiency using dynamic input sets.
