# Asking Clarifying Questions in Open-Domain Information-Seeking Conversations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06554 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.06554/

## Key facts

- Cited by 139 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 139)

- [Retrieving and Reading: A Comprehensive Survey on Open-domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00774/) (2021)
- [Assisting in Writing Wikipedia-like Articles From Scratch with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14207/) (2024)
- [Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18418/) (2024)
- [Let the LLMs Talk: Simulating Human-to-Human Conversational QA via Zero-Shot LLM-to-LLM Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02913/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Proactive Dialogue Systems: Problems, Methods, and Prospects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02750/) (2023)
- [Building and Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue Corpora with Clarifying Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05794/) (2021)
- [CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17043/) (2024)
- [Towards Human-centered Proactive Conversational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12670/) (2024)
- [Magentic-UI: Towards Human-in-the-loop Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.22358/) (2025)
- [Knowledge-enhanced Mixed-initiative Dialogue System for Emotional Support Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10172/) (2023)
- [Ask what's missing and what's useful: Improving Clarification Question Generation using Global Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06828/) (2021)
- [ClarifyDelphi: Reinforced Clarification Questions with Defeasibility Rewards for Social and Moral Situations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10409/) (2022)
- [Active Preference Inference using Language Models and Probabilistic Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12009/) (2023)
- [Task Ambiguity in Humans and Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10711/) (2022)
- [INSCIT: Information-Seeking Conversations with Mixed-Initiative Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00746/) (2022)
- [HiL-Bench (Human-in-Loop Benchmark): Do Agents Know When to Ask for Help?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09408/) (2026)
- [Asking Clarification Questions to Handle Ambiguity in Open-Domain QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13808/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Mixed-initiative Conversational Search Systems via User Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08046/) (2022)
- [DRAGged into Conflicts: Detecting and Addressing Conflicting Sources in Search-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08500/) (2025)
- [On the Calibration and Uncertainty of Neural Learning to Rank Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.04356/) (2021)
- [Probing the Multi-turn Planning Capabilities of LLMs via 20 Question Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01468/) (2023)
- [From Passive to Active Reasoning: Can Large Language Models Ask the Right Questions under Incomplete Information?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08295/) (2025)
- [Asking It All: Generating Contextualized Questions for any Semantic Role](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04832/) (2021)
- [ISEEQ: Information Seeking Question Generation using Dynamic Meta-Information Retrieval and Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07622/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Conversational Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15576/) (2024)
- [Ask or Assume? Uncertainty-Aware Clarification-Seeking in Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.26233/) (2026)
- [Python Code Generation by Asking Clarification Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09885/) (2022)
- [STYLE: Improving Domain Transferability of Asking Clarification Questions in Large Language Model Powered Conversational Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12059/) (2024)
- [Interactive-Chain-Prompting: Ambiguity Resolution for Crosslingual Conditional Generation with Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10309/) (2023)
- [Query Performance Prediction: From Ad-hoc to Conversational Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10923/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Users often fail to formulate their complex information needs in a single query. As a consequence, they may need to scan multiple result pages or reformulate their queries, which may be a frustrating experience. Alternatively, systems can improve user satisfaction by proactively asking questions of the users to clarify their information needs. Asking clarifying questions is especially important in conversational systems since they can only return a limited number of (often only one) result(s). In this paper, we formulate the task of asking clarifying questions in open-domain information-seeking conversational systems. To this end, we propose an offline evaluation methodology for the task and collect a dataset, called Qulac, through crowdsourcing. Our dataset is built on top of the TREC Web Track 2009-2012 data and consists of over 10K question-answer pairs for 198 TREC topics with 762 facets. Our experiments on an oracle model demonstrate that asking only one good question leads to over 170% retrieval performance improvement in terms of P@1, which clearly demonstrates the potential impact of the task. We further propose a retrieval framework consisting of three components: question retrieval, question selection, and document retrieval. In particular, our question selection model takes into account the original query and previous question-answer interactions while selecting the next question. Our model significantly outperforms competitive baselines. To foster research in this area, we have made Qulac publicly available.
