# Multimodal and Multi-view Models for Emotion Recognition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.10198 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10198/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Learning Audio-Video Modalities from Image Captions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.00679/) (2022)
- [Multimodal Prompt Learning with Missing Modalities for Sentiment Analysis and Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05374/) (2024)
- [Group Gated Fusion on Attention-based Bidirectional Alignment for Multimodal Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06309/) (2022)
- [Inconsistent Matters: A Knowledge-guided Dual-consistency Network for Multi-modal Rumor Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02137/) (2023)
- [Examining Modality Incongruity in Multimodal Federated Learning for Medical Vision and Language-based Disease Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05294/) (2024)
- [Missing-by-Design: Certifiable Modality Deletion for Revocable Multimodal Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16144/) (2026)
- [Representation Learning with Graph Neural Networks for Speech Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09830/) (2022)
- [AiM: Taking Answers in Mind to Correct Chinese Cloze Tests in Educational Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12505/) (2022)
- [Modality Disentangled Learning for Incomplete Multimodal Emotion Recognition: A Primitive Memory Distillation Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30563/) (2026)
- [A Robust Incomplete Multimodal Low-Rank Adaptation Approach for Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.11202/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Studies on emotion recognition (ER) show that combining lexical and acoustic information results in more robust and accurate models. The majority of the studies focus on settings where both modalities are available in training and evaluation. However, in practice, this is not always the case; getting ASR output may represent a bottleneck in a deployment pipeline due to computational complexity or privacy-related constraints. To address this challenge, we study the problem of efficiently combining acoustic and lexical modalities during training while still providing a deployable acoustic model that does not require lexical inputs. We first experiment with multimodal models and two attention mechanisms to assess the extent of the benefits that lexical information can provide. Then, we frame the task as a multi-view learning problem to induce semantic information from a multimodal model into our acoustic-only network using a contrastive loss function. Our multimodal model outperforms the previous state of the art on the USC-IEMOCAP dataset reported on lexical and acoustic information. Additionally, our multi-view-trained acoustic network significantly surpasses models that have been exclusively trained with acoustic features.
