# SherLIiC: A Typed Event-Focused Lexical Inference Benchmark for Evaluating Natural Language Inference

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01393 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01393/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Robustness Gym: Unifying the NLP Evaluation Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.04840/) (2021)
- [Robust Natural Language Processing: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.00768/) (2022)
- [Language Models for Lexical Inference in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05331/) (2021)
- [Incorporating Temporal Information in Entailment Graph Mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09412/) (2021)
- [Language Models Are Poor Learners of Directional Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04695/) (2022)
- [Continuous Entailment Patterns for Lexical Inference in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.03695/) (2021)
- [From the One, Judge of the Whole: Typed Entailment Graph Construction with Predicate Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04170/) (2023)
- [Explaining Textual Entailment with Lexical Entailments: Using LLMs to Supply Lexical Relations for Formal Proofs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32491/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present SherLIiC, a testbed for lexical inference in context (LIiC), consisting of 3985 manually annotated inference rule candidates (InfCands), accompanied by (i) ~960k unlabeled InfCands, and (ii) ~190k typed textual relations between Freebase entities extracted from the large entity-linked corpus ClueWeb09. Each InfCand consists of one of these relations, expressed as a lemmatized dependency path, and two argument placeholders, each linked to one or more Freebase types. Due to our candidate selection process based on strong distributional evidence, SherLIiC is much harder than existing testbeds because distributional evidence is of little utility in the classification of InfCands. We also show that, due to its construction, many of SherLIiC's correct InfCands are novel and missing from existing rule bases. We evaluate a number of strong baselines on SherLIiC, ranging from semantic vector space models to state of the art neural models of natural language inference (NLI). We show that SherLIiC poses a tough challenge to existing NLI systems.
