# An attention-based multi-resolution model for prostate whole slide imageclassification and localization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13208 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13208/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 30 May 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [A Comprehensive Review of Computer-aided Whole-slide Image Analysis: from Datasets to Feature Extraction, Segmentation, Classification, and Detection Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.10553/) (2021)
- [WeGleNet: A Weakly-Supervised Convolutional Neural Network for the Semantic Segmentation of Gleason Grades in Prostate Histology Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.10445/) (2021)
- [A State-of-the-art Survey of Artificial Neural Networks for Whole-slide Image Analysis:from Popular Convolutional Neural Networks to Potential Visual Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06243/) (2021)
- [ASMIL: Attention-Stabilized Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06658/) (2026)
- [End-to-end Multiple Instance Learning with Gradient Accumulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03981/) (2022)
- [Critical Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence as Digital Twin of Pathologist for Prostate Cancer Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11992/) (2023)
- [GCE-MIL: Faithful and Recoverable Evidence for Multiple Instance Learning in Whole-Slide Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17456/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Histology review is often used as the `gold standard' for disease diagnosis. Computer aided diagnosis tools can potentially help improve current pathology workflows by reducing examination time and interobserver variability. Previous work in cancer grading has focused mainly on classifying pre-defined regions of interest (ROIs), or relied on large amounts of fine-grained labels. In this paper, we propose a two-stage attention-based multiple instance learning model for slide-level cancer grading and weakly-supervised ROI detection and demonstrate its use in prostate cancer. Compared with existing Gleason classification models, our model goes a step further by utilizing visualized saliency maps to select informative tiles for fine-grained grade classification. The model was primarily developed on a large-scale whole slide dataset consisting of 3,521 prostate biopsy slides with only slide-level labels from 718 patients. The model achieved state-of-the-art performance for prostate cancer grading with an accuracy of 85.11% for classifying benign, low-grade (Gleason grade 3+3 or 3+4), and high-grade (Gleason grade 4+3 or higher) slides on an independent test set.
