# Provably Efficient Q-Learning with Low Switching Cost

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.12849 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12849/

## Key facts

- Cited by 78 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 30 May 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 78)

- [Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04895/) (2021)
- [Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation Under Adaptivity Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02195/) (2021)
- [Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06548/) (2021)
- [Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13890/) (2022)
- [Understanding Domain Randomization for Sim-to-real Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03239/) (2021)
- [Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08695/) (2021)
- [Unpacking Reward Shaping: Understanding the Benefits of Reward Engineering on Sample Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09579/) (2022)
- [Near-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning via Double Variance Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01748/) (2021)
- [Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04645/) (2021)
- [The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16589/) (2023)
- [Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13586/) (2023)
- [The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07368/) (2022)
- [A Provably Efficient Algorithm for Linear Markov Decision Process with Low Switching Cost](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00494/) (2021)
- [The Blessing of Heterogeneity in Federated Q-Learning: Linear Speedup and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10697/) (2023)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06239/) (2021)
- [Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with loglog(T) Switching Cost](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06385/) (2022)
- [Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and Optimality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06450/) (2022)
- [Sharp Variance-Dependent Bounds in Reinforcement Learning: Best of Both Worlds in Stochastic and Deterministic Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13446/) (2023)
- [Design of Experiments for Stochastic Contextual Linear Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.09912/) (2021)
- [Constant Stepsize Q-learning: Distributional Convergence, Bias and Extrapolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13884/) (2024)
- [Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching Markets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03684/) (2022)
- [Reward-agnostic Fine-tuning: Provable Statistical Benefits of Hybrid Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10282/) (2023)
- [Upper and Lower Bounds for Distributionally Robust Off-Dynamics Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.20521/) (2024)
- [Sublinear Least-Squares Value Iteration via Locality Sensitive Hashing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.08285/) (2021)
- [Minimax-Optimal Reward-Agnostic Exploration in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07278/) (2023)
- [A Nearly Optimal and Low-Switching Algorithm for Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15238/) (2023)
- [Byzantine-Robust Online and Offline Distributed Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00165/) (2022)
- [Near-Optimal Deployment Efficiency in Reward-Free Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00701/) (2022)
- [Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Multi-batch Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08238/) (2022)
- [Policy Finetuning in Reinforcement Learning via Design of Experiments using Offline Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04354/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We take initial steps in studying PAC-MDP algorithms with limited adaptivity, that is, algorithms that change its exploration policy as infrequently as possible during regret minimization. This is motivated by the difficulty of running fully adaptive algorithms in real-world applications (such as medical domains), and we propose to quantify adaptivity using the notion of local switching cost. Our main contribution, Q-Learning with UCB2 exploration, is a model-free algorithm for H-step episodic MDP that achieves sublinear regret whose local switching cost in K episodes is O(H3SAlog K), and we provide a lower bound of Omega(HSA) on the local switching cost for any no-regret algorithm. Our algorithm can be naturally adapted to the concurrent setting, which yields nontrivial results that improve upon prior work in certain aspects.
