# Contextuality in Human Decision Making in the Presence of Direct Influences: A Comment on Basieva et al. (2019)

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.12570 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12570/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 7 May 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [An Extension Of Combinatorial Contextuality For Cognitive Protocols](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08209/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In a recent paper Basieva, Cervantes, Dzhafarov, and Khrennikov (2019) presented a series of experiments which they claimed show evidence for contextuality in human judgments. This was based on a set of modified Bell-like inequalities designed to rule out effects caused by signalling. In this comment we show that it is, however, possible to construct a non-contextual model which explains the experimental data via direct influences, which we take to mean that a measurement outcome has a (model-specific) causal dependence on other measurements. We trace the apparent inconsistency to a definition of signalling which does not account for all possible forms of direct influence. Further, we cast doubt on the idea that any experimental data in psychology could provide conclusive evidence for contextuality beyond that explainable by direct influence.