# On Coresets for Regularized Loss Minimization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10845 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10845/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Coresets for Classification -- Simplified and Strengthened](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04254/) (2021)
- [Dataset Distillation Meets Provable Subset Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08086/) (2023)
- [A Coreset Learning Reality Check](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.06163/) (2023)
- [Leveraging Importance Weights in Subset Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12052/) (2023)
- [AutoCoreset: An Automatic Practical Coreset Construction Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11980/) (2023)
- [Cost-Sensitive Best Subset Selection for Logistic Regression: A Mixed-Integer Conic Optimization Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05464/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We design and mathematically analyze sampling-based algorithms for regularized loss minimization problems that are implementable in popular computational models for large data, in which the access to the data is restricted in some way. Our main result is that if the regularizer's effect does not become negligible as the norm of the hypothesis scales, and as the data scales, then a uniform sample of modest size is with high probability a coreset. In the case that the loss function is either logistic regression or soft-margin support vector machines, and the regularizer is one of the common recommended choices, this result implies that a uniform sample of size O(d √n) is with high probability a coreset of n points in Red. We contrast this upper bound with two lower bounds. The first lower bound shows that our analysis of uniform sampling is tight; that is, a smaller uniform sample will likely not be a core set. The second lower bound shows that in some sense uniform sampling is close to optimal, as significantly smaller core sets do not generally exist.
