# Correlated Parameters to Accurately Measure Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01334 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01334/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13425/) (2023)
- [Uncertainty-Aware Graph Neural Networks: A Multi-Hop Evidence Fusion Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13083/) (2025)
- [Efficient Uncertainty Quantification and Reduction for Over-Parameterized Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05674/) (2023)
- [Reducing Overconfidence Predictions for Autonomous Driving Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07825/) (2022)
- [Probabilistic Approach for Road-Users Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01360/) (2021)
- [From a Point Cloud to a Simulation Model: Bayesian Segmentation and Entropy based Uncertainty Estimation for 3D Modelling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02488/) (2021)
- [Uncertainty Aware Neural Network from Similarity and Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14925/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this article a novel approach for training deep neural networks using Bayesian techniques is presented. The Bayesian methodology allows for an easy evaluation of model uncertainty and additionally is robust to overfitting. These are commonly the two main problems classical, i.e. non-Bayesian, architectures have to struggle with. The proposed approach applies variational inference in order to approximate the intractable posterior distribution. In particular, the variational distribution is defined as product of multiple multivariate normal distributions with tridiagonal covariance matrices. Each single normal distribution belongs either to the weights, or to the biases corresponding to one network layer. The layer-wise a posteriori variances are defined based on the corresponding expectation values and further the correlations are assumed to be identical. Therefore, only a few additional parameters need to be optimized compared to non-Bayesian settings. The novel approach is successfully evaluated on basis of the popular benchmark datasets MNIST and CIFAR-10.
