# Reliable and Explainable Machine Learning Methods for Accelerated Material Discovery

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02717 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.02717/

## Key facts

- Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2019.

## Built on by (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) on TimeSeries Data: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00950/) (2021)
- [Confidence Calibration for Domain Generalization under Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00742/) (2021)
- [Equivariant Networks for Crystal Structures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15420/) (2022)
- [Scalable Gaussian Processes for Data-Driven Design using Big Data with Categorical Factors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15356/) (2021)
- [MetaNO: How to Transfer Your Knowledge on Learning Hidden Physics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12095/) (2023)
- [MEGAN: Multi-Explanation Graph Attention Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13236/) (2022)
- [MetaNOR: A Meta-Learnt Nonlocal Operator Regression Approach for Metamaterial Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02040/) (2022)
- [Comparing Uncertainty Measurement and Mitigation Methods for Large Language Models: A Systematic Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18346/) (2025)
- [BOOM: Benchmarking Out-Of-distribution Molecular Property Predictions of Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.01912/) (2025)
- [On Explainability in AI-Solutions: A Cross-Domain Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05173/) (2022)
- [Building Trustworthy AI for Materials Discovery: From Autonomous Laboratories to Z-scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.01080/) (2025)
- [A New Approach for Interpretability and Reliability in Clinical Risk Prediction: Acute Coronary Syndrome Scenario](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08331/) (2021)
- [Diverse Explanations From Data-Driven and Domain-Driven Perspectives in the Physical Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00347/) (2024)
- [Active Causal Learning for Decoding Chemical Complexities with Targeted Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04224/) (2024)
- [Estimate Deformation Capacity of Non-Ductile RC Shear Walls using Explainable Boosting Machine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04652/) (2023)
- [EXAGREE: Mitigating Explanation Disagreement with Stakeholder-Aligned Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01956/) (2024)
- [Spectral Analysis of Molecular Features: When Richer Features Do Not Guarantee Better Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14217/) (2025)
- [SemiConLens: Visual Analytics for 2D Semiconductor Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.04067/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Material scientists are increasingly adopting the use of machine learning (ML) for making potentially important decisions, such as, discovery, development, optimization, synthesis and characterization of materials. However, despite ML's impressive performance in commercial applications, several unique challenges exist when applying ML in materials science applications. In such a context, the contributions of this work are twofold. First, we identify common pitfalls of existing ML techniques when learning from underrepresented/imbalanced material data. Specifically, we show that with imbalanced data, standard methods for assessing quality of ML models break down and lead to misleading conclusions. Furthermore, we found that the model's own confidence score cannot be trusted and model introspection methods (using simpler models) do not help as they result in loss of predictive performance (reliability-explainability trade-off). Second, to overcome these challenges, we propose a general-purpose explainable and reliable machine-learning framework. Specifically, we propose a novel pipeline that employs an ensemble of simpler models to reliably predict material properties. We also propose a transfer learning technique and show that the performance loss due to models' simplicity can be overcome by exploiting correlations among different material properties. A new evaluation metric and a trust score to better quantify the confidence in the predictions are also proposed. To improve the interpretability, we add a rationale generator component to our framework which provides both model-level and decision-level explanations. Finally, we demonstrate the versatility of our technique on two applications: 1) predicting properties of crystalline compounds, and 2) identifying novel potentially stable solar cell materials.