# e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.01193 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01193/

## Key facts

- Cited by 468 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 468)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11446/) (2021)
- [STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14465/) (2022)
- [Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02301/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Improve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11610/) (2022)
- [An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08747/) (2023)
- [Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.01243/) (2021)
- [Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01017/) (2021)
- [From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08164/) (2022)
- [Can language models learn from explanations in context?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02329/) (2022)
- [LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18403/) (2024)
- [OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.12017/) (2022)
- [Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.08541/) (2021)
- [On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08061/) (2022)
- [ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07919/) (2022)
- [The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.03401/) (2022)
- [Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07736/) (2023)
- [Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14763/) (2023)
- [Maieutic Prompting: Logically Consistent Reasoning with Recursive Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11822/) (2022)
- [A Review on Language Models as Knowledge Bases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06031/) (2022)
- [Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.04840/) (2021)
- [Fine-tuned Language Models are Continual Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12393/) (2022)
- [Explaining Answers with Entailment Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08661/) (2021)
- [Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also "Think" Step-by-Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14050/) (2023)
- [Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11114/) (2022)
- [Language Models as Agent Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.01681/) (2022)
- [Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11326/) (2022)
- [Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.13243/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In order for machine learning to garner widespread public adoption, models must be able to provide interpretable and robust explanations for their decisions, as well as learn from human-provided explanations at train time. In this work, we extend the Stanford Natural Language Inference dataset with an additional layer of human-annotated natural language explanations of the entailment relations. We further implement models that incorporate these explanations into their training process and output them at test time. We show how our corpus of explanations, which we call e-SNLI, can be used for various goals, such as obtaining full sentence justifications of a model's decisions, improving universal sentence representations and transferring to out-of-domain NLI datasets. Our dataset thus opens up a range of research directions for using natural language explanations, both for improving models and for asserting their trust.