# What's in a GitHub Star? Understanding Repository Starring Practices in a Social Coding Platform

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.07643 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07643/

## Key facts

- Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [A Perspective on Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods: SHAP and LIME](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02012/) (2023)
- [Inside the Scaffold: A Source-Code Taxonomy of Coding Agent Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03515/) (2026)
- [Decoding the Configuration of AI Coding Agents: Insights from Claude Code Projects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.09268/) (2025)
- [Challenges and Practices of Deep Learning Model Reengineering: A Case Study on Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07476/) (2023)
- [On Wasted Contributions: Understanding the Dynamics of Contributor-Abandoned Pull Requests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.15447/) (2021)
- [Towards a Change Taxonomy for Machine Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11365/) (2022)
- [On the Workflows and Smells of Leaderboard Operations (LBOps): An Exploratory Study of Foundation Model Leaderboards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04065/) (2024)
- [XMainframe: A Large Language Model for Mainframe Modernization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04660/) (2024)
- [A Large-Scale Study of Model Integration in ML-Enabled Software Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06226/) (2024)
- [Discrepancies among Pre-trained Deep Neural Networks: A New Threat to Model Zoo Reliability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02551/) (2023)
- [Characterizing the contribution of dependent features in XAI methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01717/) (2023)
- [An Empirical Study of Challenges in Machine Learning Asset Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15990/) (2024)
- [GitRank: A Framework to Rank GitHub Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.02360/) (2022)
- [Predicting the First Response Latency of Maintainers and Contributors in Pull Requests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07786/) (2023)
- [An Empirical Study of Library Usage and Dependency in Deep Learning Frameworks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15733/) (2022)
- [Tangent: An Empirical Study of Testing Practices for LLM-Based Agent Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.08413/) (2026)
- [Cross-Domain Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Type Inference System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09189/) (2022)
- [Are Machine Programming Systems using Right Source-Code Measures to Select Code Repositories?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11946/) (2022)
- [Synergizing LLMs and Knowledge Graphs: A Novel Approach to Software Repository-Related Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03815/) (2024)
- [Developing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering: A Mixed-Method Experience Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11965/) (2026)
- [Content-Based Textual File Type Detection at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08508/) (2021)
- [The Invisible Hand of AI Libraries Shaping Open Source Projects and Communities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01944/) (2026)
- [ATLAS: Agentic Taxonomy of Large-Scale Software Ecosystems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.21597/) (2026)
- [How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.21832/) (2026)
- [A Two-Dimensional Study of the Model Context Protocol: Publication and Adoption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14721/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Besides a git-based version control system, GitHub integrates several social coding features. Particularly, GitHub users can star a repository, presumably to manifest interest or satisfaction with an open source project. However, the real and practical meaning of starring a project was never the subject of an in-depth and well-founded empirical investigation. Therefore, we provide in this paper a throughout study on the meaning, characteristics, and dynamic growth of GitHub stars. First, by surveying 791 developers, we report that three out of four developers consider the number of stars before using or contributing to a GitHub project. Then, we report a quantitative analysis on the characteristics of the top-5,000 most starred GitHub repositories. We propose four patterns to describe stars growth, which are derived after clustering the time series representing the number of stars of the studied repositories; we also reveal the perception of 115 developers about these growth patterns. To conclude, we provide a list of recommendations to open source project managers (e.g., on the importance of social media promotion) and to GitHub users and Software Engineering researchers (e.g., on the risks faced when selecting projects by GitHub stars).