# Improving Trajectory Optimization using a Roadmap Framework

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02044 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.02044/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Autonomous Vehicle Parking in Dynamic Environments: An Integrated System with Prediction and Motion Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10383/) (2022)
- [SEG-Parking: Towards Safe, Efficient, and Generalizable Autonomous Parking via End-to-End Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13956/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present an evaluation of several representative sampling-based and optimization-based motion planners, and then introduce an integrated motion planning system which incorporates recent advances in trajectory optimization into a sparse roadmap framework. Through experiments in 4 common application scenarios with 5000 test cases each, we show that optimization-based or sampling-based planners alone are not effective for realistic problems where fast planning times are required. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that presents such a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art motion planners, which are based on a significant amount of experiments. We then combine different stand-alone planners with trajectory optimization. The results show that the combination of our sparse roadmap and trajectory optimization provides superior performance over other standard sampling-based planners combinations. By using a multi-query roadmap instead of generating completely new trajectories for each planning problem, our approach allows for extensions such as persistent control policy information associated with a trajectory across planning problems. Also, the sub-optimality resulting from the sparsity of roadmap, as well as the unexpected disturbances from the environment, can both be overcome by the real-time trajectory optimization process.
