# Playing the Game of Universal Adversarial Perturbations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.07802 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.07802/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [A Survey On Universal Adversarial Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01498/) (2021)
- [Meta Adversarial Training against Universal Patches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11453/) (2021)
- [Two Coupled Rejection Metrics Can Tell Adversarial Examples Apart](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14785/) (2021)
- [SAM Meets UAP: Attacking Segment Anything Model With Universal Adversarial Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12431/) (2023)
- [The Uncanny Valley: Exploring Adversarial Robustness from a Flatness Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16918/) (2024)
- [Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13024/) (2025)
- [When Flatness Does (Not) Guarantee Adversarial Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14231/) (2025)
- [Universal Adversarial Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15997/) (2022)
- [Cross-Input Certified Training for Universal Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09176/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of learning classifiers robust to universal adversarial perturbations. While prior work approaches this problem via robust optimization, adversarial training, or input transformation, we instead phrase it as a two-player zero-sum game. In this new formulation, both players simultaneously play the same game, where one player chooses a classifier that minimizes a classification loss whilst the other player creates an adversarial perturbation that increases the same loss when applied to every sample in the training set. By observing that performing a classification (respectively creating adversarial samples) is the best response to the other player, we propose a novel extension of a game-theoretic algorithm, namely fictitious play, to the domain of training robust classifiers. Finally, we empirically show the robustness and versatility of our approach in two defence scenarios where universal attacks are performed on several image classification datasets -- CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and ImageNet.
