# From Same Photo: Cheating on Visual Kinship Challenges

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.06200 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06200/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [The 5th Recognizing Families in the Wild Data Challenge: Predicting Kinship from Faces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00598/) (2021)
- [Automated Fetal Biometry Assessment with Deep Ensembles using Sparse-Sampling of 2D Intrapartum Ultrasound Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14572/) (2025)
- [Kinship Verification through a Forest Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18910/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the propensity for deep learning models to learn unintended signals from data sets there is always the possibility that the network can `cheat' in order to solve a task. In the instance of data sets for visual kinship verification, one such unintended signal could be that the faces are cropped from the same photograph, since faces from the same photograph are more likely to be from the same family. In this paper we investigate the influence of this artefactual data inference in published data sets for kinship verification. To this end, we obtain a large dataset, and train a CNN classifier to determine if two faces are from the same photograph or not. Using this classifier alone as a naive classifier of kinship, we demonstrate near state of the art results on five public benchmark data sets for kinship verification - achieving over 90% accuracy on one of them. Thus, we conclude that faces derived from the same photograph are a strong inadvertent signal in all the data sets we examined, and it is likely that the fraction of kinship explained by existing kinship models is small.