# Convex optimization using quantum oracles

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00643 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.00643/

## Key facts

- Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Beyond Classical Attention: Quantum Attention for Scalable Computation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08045/) (2023)
- [Quantum Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Linear Regression with Norm Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13086/) (2021)
- [Quantum Speedups of Optimizing Approximately Convex Functions with Applications to Logarithmic Regret Stochastic Convex Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12897/) (2022)
- [On Quantum Speedups for Nonconvex Optimization via Quantum Tunneling Walks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14501/) (2022)
- [Quantum Algorithms for Sampling Log-Concave Distributions and Estimating Normalizing Constants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06539/) (2022)
- [Quantum Langevin Dynamics for Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15587/) (2023)
- [Near-Optimal Lower Bounds For Convex Optimization For All Orders of Smoothness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01118/) (2021)
- [Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithm for semidefinite programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03891/) (2021)
- [On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03161/) (2023)
- [Quantum Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Finite-Sum Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03006/) (2024)
- [First steps towards quantum machine learning applied to the classification of event-related potentials](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02648/) (2023)
- [Quantum Non-Linear Bandit Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.03023/) (2025)
- [Quantum Speedups for Sampling and Non-convex Optimization with Stochastic Oracles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03626/) (2025)
- [Quantum Algorithms for Bandits with Knapsacks with Improved Regret and Time Complexities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04438/) (2025)
- [Sublinear Time Quantum Algorithm for Attention Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00874/) (2026)
- [A Nearly Quadratic Lower Bound for Linear Optimization over Convex Bodies in the Membership Oracle Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.30215/) (2026)
- [Gradient Testing and Estimation by Comparisons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11454/) (2024)
- [On Quantum Perceptron Learning via Quantum Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17308/) (2025)
- [Quantum Algorithms for Projection-Free Sparse Convex Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08543/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We study to what extent quantum algorithms can speed up solving convex optimization problems. Following the classical literature we assume access to a convex set via various oracles, and we examine the efficiency of reductions between the different oracles. In particular, we show how a separation oracle can be implemented using tildeO(1) quantum queries to a membership oracle, which is an exponential quantum speed-up over the Omega(n) membership queries that are needed classically. We show that a quantum computer can very efficiently compute an approximate subgradient of a convex Lipschitz function. Combining this with a simplification of recent classical work of Lee, Sidford, and Vempala gives our efficient separation oracle. This in turn implies, via a known algorithm, that tildeO(n) quantum queries to a membership oracle suffice to implement an optimization oracle (the best known classical upper bound on the number of membership queries is quadratic). We also prove several lower bounds: Omega(√n) quantum separation (or membership) queries are needed for optimization if the algorithm knows an interior point of the convex set, and Omega(n) quantum separation queries are needed if it does not.
