# Concrete Semantics with Coq and CoqHammer

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.06413 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.06413/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [A Case Study on the Effectiveness of LLMs in Verification with Proof Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18587/) (2025)
- [From Natural Language to Verified Code: Toward AI Assisted Problem-to-Code Generation with Dafny-Based Formal Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.22601/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The "Concrete Semantics" book gives an introduction to imperative programming languages accompanied by an Isabelle/HOL formalization. In this paper we discuss a re-formalization of the book using the Coq proof assistant. In order to achieve a similar brevity of the formal text we extensively use CoqHammer, as well as Coq Ltac-level automation. We compare the formalization efficiency, compactness, and the readability of the proof scripts originating from a Coq re-formalization of two chapters from the book.
