# The division of labor in communication: Speakers help listeners account for asymmetries in visual perspective

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.09000 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.09000/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? The Misleading Success of Simulating Social Interactions With LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05020/) (2024)
- [Cognitive science as a source of forward and inverse models of human decisions for robotics and control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00127/) (2021)
- [Maintaining Common Ground in Dynamic Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14207/) (2021)
- [Towards a Fully Interpretable and More Scalable RSA Model for Metaphor Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02983/) (2024)
- [Planning Ahead with RSA: Efficient Signalling in Dynamic Environments by Projecting User Awareness across Future Timesteps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23340/) (2025)
- [Are you with me? A Framework for Detecting Mental Model Discrepancies in Task-Based Team Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03149/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent debates over adults' theory of mind use have been fueled by surprising failures of perspective-taking in communication, suggesting that perspective-taking can be relatively effortful. How, then, should speakers and listeners allocate their resources to achieve successful communication? We begin with the observation that this shared goal induces a natural division of labor: the resources one agent chooses to allocate toward perspective-taking should depend on their expectations about the other's allocation. We formalize this idea in a resource-rational model augmenting recent probabilistic weighting accounts with a mechanism for (costly) control over the degree of perspective-taking. In a series of simulations, we first derive an intermediate degree of perspective weighting as an optimal tradeoff between expected costs and benefits of perspective-taking. We then present two behavioral experiments testing novel predictions of our model. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the presence or absence of occlusions in a director-matcher task and found that speakers spontaneously produced more informative descriptions to account for "known unknowns" in their partner's private view. In Experiment 2, we compared the scripted utterances used by confederates in prior work with those produced in interactions with unscripted directors. We found that confederates were systematically less informative than listeners would initially expect given the presence of occlusions, but listeners used violations to adaptively make fewer errors over time. Taken together, our work suggests that people are not simply "mindblind"; they use contextually appropriate expectations to navigate the division of labor with their partner. We discuss how a resource rational framework may provide a more deeply explanatory foundation for understanding flexible perspective-taking under processing constraints.