# Make ℓ1 Regularization Effective in Training Sparse CNN

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.04222 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.04222/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Optimal Approximation Rate of ReLU Networks in terms of Width and Depth](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00502/) (2021)
- [Deep Network Approximation: Achieving Arbitrary Accuracy with Fixed Number of Neurons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02397/) (2021)
- [An Interpretive Constrained Linear Model for ResNet and MgNet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07441/) (2021)
- [A phase transition for finding needles in nonlinear haystacks with LASSO artificial neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08652/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Compressed Sensing using ℓ1 regularization is among the most powerful and popular sparsification technique in many applications, but why has it not been used to obtain sparse deep learning model such as convolutional neural network (CNN)? This paper is aimed to provide an answer to this question and to show how to make it work. We first demonstrate that the commonly used stochastic gradient decent (SGD) and variants training algorithm is not an appropriate match with ℓ1 regularization and then replace it with a different training algorithm based on a regularized dual averaging (RDA) method. RDA was originally designed specifically for convex problem, but with new theoretical insight and algorithmic modifications (using proper initialization and adaptivity), we have made it an effective match with ℓ1 regularization to achieve a state-of-the-art sparsity for CNN compared to other weight pruning methods without compromising accuracy (achieving 95% sparsity for ResNet18 on CIFAR-10, for example).
