# Quantifying model form uncertainty in Reynolds-averaged turbulence models with Bayesian deep neural networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.02901 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02901/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Benchmarking Autoregressive Conditional Diffusion Models for Turbulent Flow Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01745/) (2023)
- [Spline-PINN: Approaching PDEs without Data using Fast, Physics-Informed Hermite-Spline CNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07143/) (2021)
- [Mosaic Flows: A Transferable Deep Learning Framework for Solving PDEs on Unseen Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10873/) (2021)
- [PDE-Transformer: Efficient and Versatile Transformers for Physics Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24717/) (2025)
- [Uncertainty-aware Surrogate Models for Airfoil Flow Simulations with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05320/) (2023)
- [State estimation with limited sensors -- A deep learning based approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11513/) (2021)
- [Using Machine Learning at Scale in HPC Simulations with SmartSim: An Application to Ocean Climate Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09355/) (2021)
- [Predicting waves in fluids with deep neural network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06628/) (2022)
- [A probabilistic, data-driven closure model for RANS simulations with aleatoric, model uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02432/) (2023)
- [PIAT: Physics Informed Adversarial Training for Solving Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.06647/) (2022)
- [Stochastic Operator Network: A Stochastic Maximum Principle Based Approach to Operator Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10401/) (2025)
- [In Situ Framework for Coupling Simulation and Machine Learning with Application to CFD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.12900/) (2023)
- [A Bayesian Multiscale Deep Learning Framework for Flows in Random Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09056/) (2021)
- [Graph Laplacian-based Bayesian Multi-fidelity Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.08211/) (2024)
- [Convergence Analysis for Training Stochastic Neural Networks via Stochastic Gradient Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08924/) (2022)
- [Quantifying Out-of-Training Uncertainty of Neural-Network based Turbulence Closures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16891/) (2025)
- [The Sensitivity of Variational Bayesian Neural Network Performance to Hyperparameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20574/) (2025)
- [PHASE: Physics-Integrated, Heterogeneity-Aware Surrogates for Scientific Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23453/) (2025)
- [Physics-Informed Teacher-Student Ensemble Learning for Traffic State Estimation with a Varying Speed Limit Scenario](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11346/) (2026)
- [Predictive Uncertainty for Neural CAE Surrogates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25430/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven methods for improving turbulence modeling in Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations have gained significant interest in the computational fluid dynamics community. Modern machine learning algorithms have opened up a new area of black-box turbulence models allowing for the tuning of RANS simulations to increase their predictive accuracy. While several data-driven turbulence models have been reported, the quantification of the uncertainties introduced has mostly been neglected. Uncertainty quantification for such data-driven models is essential since their predictive capability rapidly declines as they are tested for flow physics that deviate from that in the training data. In this work, we propose a novel data-driven framework that not only improves RANS predictions but also provides probabilistic bounds for fluid quantities such as velocity and pressure. The uncertainties capture both model form uncertainty as well as epistemic uncertainty induced by the limited training data. An invariant Bayesian deep neural network is used to predict the anisotropic tensor component of the Reynolds stress. This model is trained using Stein variational gradient decent algorithm. The computed uncertainty on the Reynolds stress is propagated to the quantities of interest by vanilla Monte Carlo simulation. Results are presented for two test cases that differ geometrically from the training flows at several different Reynolds numbers. The prediction enhancement of the data-driven model is discussed as well as the associated probabilistic bounds for flow properties of interest. Ultimately this framework allows for a quantitative measurement of model confidence and uncertainty quantification for flows in which no high-fidelity observations or prior knowledge is available.