# NDN, CoAP, and MQTT: A Comparative Measurement Study in the IoT

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01444 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01444/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Framework for Benchmarking Real-Time Embedded Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11580/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper takes a comprehensive view on the protocol stacks that are under debate for a future Internet of Things (IoT). It addresses the holistic question of which solution is beneficial for common IoT use cases. We deploy NDN and the two popular IP-based application protocols, CoAP and MQTT, in its different variants on a large-scale IoT testbed in single- and multi-hop scenarios. We analyze the use cases of scheduled periodic and unscheduled traffic under varying loads. Our findings indicate that (a) NDN admits the most resource-friendly deployment on nodes, and (b) shows superior robustness and resilience in multi-hop scenarios, while (c) the IP protocols operate at less overhead and higher speed in single-hop deployments. Most strikingly we find that NDN-based protocols are in significantly better flow balance than the UDP-based IP protocols and require less corrective actions.