# Argument Harvesting Using Chatbots

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.04253 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04253/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 May 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Strategic Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion: Framework and Experiments Based on Modelling the Beliefs and Concerns of the Persuadee](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11870/) (2021)
- [Computational Argumentation-based Chatbots: a Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03454/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Much research in computational argumentation assumes that arguments and counterarguments can be obtained in some way. Yet, to improve and apply models of argument, we need methods for acquiring them. Current approaches include argument mining from text, hand coding of arguments by researchers, or generating arguments from knowledge bases. In this paper, we propose a new approach, which we call argument harvesting, that uses a chatbot to enter into a dialogue with a participant to get arguments and counterarguments from him or her. Because it is automated, the chatbot can be used repeatedly in many dialogues, and thereby it can generate a large corpus. We describe the architecture of the chatbot, provide methods for managing a corpus of arguments and counterarguments, and an evaluation of our approach in a case study concerning attitudes of women to participation in sport.