# Generating Bilingual Pragmatic Color References

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03917 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03917/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Pragmatics in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey on Datasets, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12378/) (2025)
- [Perceptual Structure in the Absence of Grounding for LLMs: The Impact of Abstractedness and Subjectivity in Color Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13105/) (2023)
- [Color Overmodification Emerges from Data-Driven Learning and Pragmatic Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09172/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Contextual influences on language often exhibit substantial cross-lingual regularities; for example, we are more verbose in situations that require finer distinctions. However, these regularities are sometimes obscured by semantic and syntactic differences. Using a newly-collected dataset of color reference games in Mandarin Chinese (which we release to the public), we confirm that a variety of constructions display the same sensitivity to contextual difficulty in Chinese and English. We then show that a neural speaker agent trained on bilingual data with a simple multitask learning approach displays more human-like patterns of context dependence and is more pragmatically informative than its monolingual Chinese counterpart. Moreover, this is not at the expense of language-specific semantic understanding: the resulting speaker model learns the different basic color term systems of English and Chinese (with noteworthy cross-lingual influences), and it can identify synonyms between the two languages using vector analogy operations on its output layer, despite having no exposure to parallel data.
