# A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01933 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/

## Key facts

- Cited by 973 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 973)

- [Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05782/) (2023)
- [Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01889/) (2021)
- [From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08164/) (2022)
- [Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01167/) (2021)
- [Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00725/) (2021)
- [Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03738/) (2023)
- [Interactive and Explainable Region-guided Radiology Report Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08295/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13076/) (2021)
- [Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12060/) (2021)
- [OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.11104/) (2022)
- [Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06420/) (2021)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19775/) (2023)
- [Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.10790/) (2021)
- [CF-GNNExplainer: Counterfactual Explanations for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.03322/) (2021)
- [What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07817/) (2021)
- [XAI for Transformers: Better Explanations through Conservative Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07304/) (2022)
- [A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00467/) (2021)
- [Concept-based Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12936/) (2023)
- [Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06641/) (2021)
- [A Comprehensive Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Survey of Surveys on Methods and Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07190/) (2021)
- [CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00783/) (2021)
- [Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11584/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Bias in Visual Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07919/) (2021)
- [Explanations in Autonomous Driving: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.05154/) (2021)
- [Explainability of deep vision-based autonomous driving systems: Review and challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05307/) (2021)
- [GlanceNets: Interpretabile, Leak-proof Concept-based Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15612/) (2022)
- [Understanding the Role of Human Intuition on Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making with Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07255/) (2023)
- [Argumentative XAI: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.11266/) (2021)
- [Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content Moderation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.11788/) (2022)
- ["Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03735/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the last years many accurate decision support systems have been constructed as black boxes, that is as systems that hide their internal logic to the user. This lack of explanation constitutes both a practical and an ethical issue. The literature reports many approaches aimed at overcoming this crucial weakness sometimes at the cost of scarifying accuracy for interpretability. The applications in which black box decision systems can be used are various, and each approach is typically developed to provide a solution for a specific problem and, as a consequence, delineating explicitly or implicitly its own definition of interpretability and explanation. The aim of this paper is to provide a classification of the main problems addressed in the literature with respect to the notion of explanation and the type of black box system. Given a problem definition, a black box type, and a desired explanation this survey should help the researcher to find the proposals more useful for his own work. The proposed classification of approaches to open black box models should also be useful for putting the many research open questions in perspective.