# Innateness, AlphaZero, and Artificial Intelligence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05667 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.05667/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2018.

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03816/) (2024)
- [Why AI is Harder Than We Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12871/) (2021)
- [DALL-E 2 Fails to Reliably Capture Common Syntactic Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12889/) (2022)
- [Emergent Bartering Behaviour in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06760/) (2022)
- [Transfer of Fully Convolutional Policy-Value Networks Between Games and Game Variants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12375/) (2021)
- [Generalisation in Neural Networks Does not Require Feature Overlap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06872/) (2021)
- [AIGenC: An AI generalisation model via creativity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09738/) (2022)
- [A Roadmap to Domain Knowledge Integration in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.05712/) (2022)
- [The μG Language for Programming Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09441/) (2024)
- [From Mimicry to True Intelligence (TI) -- A New Paradigm for Artificial General Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.14474/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The concept of innateness is rarely discussed in the context of artificial intelligence. When it is discussed, or hinted at, it is often the context of trying to reduce the amount of innate machinery in a given system. In this paper, I consider as a test case a recent series of papers by Silver et al (Silver et al., 2017a) on AlphaGo and its successors that have been presented as an argument that a "even in the most challenging of domains: it is possible to train to superhuman level, without human examples or guidance", "starting tabula rasa." I argue that these claims are overstated, for multiple reasons. I close by arguing that artificial intelligence needs greater attention to innateness, and I point to some proposals about what that innateness might look like.