# Debiased Machine Learning of Set-Identified Linear Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.10024 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.10024/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [What's the Harm? Sharp Bounds on the Fraction Negatively Affected by Treatment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10327/) (2022)
- [Robust Fitted-Q-Evaluation and Iteration under Sequentially Exogenous Unobserved Confounders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00662/) (2023)
- [Quantifying Aleatoric Uncertainty of the Treatment Effect: A Novel Orthogonal Learner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03387/) (2024)
- [Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Bounds under Sample Selection with an Application to the Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.04329/) (2022)
- [Causal EpiNets: Precision-corrected Bounds on Individual Treatment Effects using Epistemic Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07065/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper provides estimation and inference methods for an identified set's boundary (i.e., support function) where the selection among a very large number of covariates is based on modern regularized tools. I characterize the boundary using a semiparametric moment equation. Combining Neyman-orthogonality and sample splitting ideas, I construct a root-N consistent, uniformly asymptotically Gaussian estimator of the boundary and propose a multiplier bootstrap procedure to conduct inference. I apply this result to the partially linear model, the partially linear IV model and the average partial derivative with an interval-valued outcome.
