# "Dave...I can assure you...that it's going to be all right..." -- A definition, case for, and survey of algorithmic assurances in human-autonomy trust relationships

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03846 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.03846/

## Key facts

- Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Overview and Field Guide for Future Research Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11561/) (2021)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00265/) (2024)
- [A Survey on AI Assurance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.07505/) (2021)
- [Interpretable Model-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning using Inductive Logic Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11417/) (2021)
- [Competency Assessment for Autonomous Agents using Deep Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12670/) (2022)
- [Learning to Forecast Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainties over Long Horizon Trajectories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08669/) (2023)
- [Uncertainty Quantification for Competency Assessment of Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10553/) (2022)
- [DCNFIS: Deep Convolutional Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06378/) (2023)
- [A Factor-Based Framework for Decision-Making Competency Self-Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11981/) (2022)
- [Explanation through Reward Model Reconciliation using POMDP Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00931/) (2023)
- [Qualitative Approaches to Voice UX](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14736/) (2024)
- [Comprehensive systematic review into combinations of artificial intelligence, human factors, and automation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09233/) (2021)
- [SINGA-Easy: An Easy-to-Use Framework for MultiModal Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.02572/) (2021)
- [VisualTextRank: Unsupervised Graph-based Content Extraction for Automating Ad Text to Image Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.02725/) (2021)
- [Text is NOT Enough: Integrating Visual Impressions into Open-domain Dialogue Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05778/) (2021)
- [Discovering Personalized Semantics for Soft Attributes in Recommender Systems using Concept Activation Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02830/) (2022)
- [Reinforced MOOCs Concept Recommendation in Heterogeneous Information Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11011/) (2022)
- [Explanation-Guided Fairness Testing through Genetic Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.08335/) (2022)
- [Using Graph Neural Networks for Program Termination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14648/) (2022)
- [Tribe or Not? Critical Inspection of Group Differences Using TribalGram](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09664/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Quantitative Modeling of Trust in Online Social Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.11054/) (2026)
- [Robotics-Inspired Guardrails for Foundation Models in Socially Sensitive Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19940/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

People who design, use, and are affected by autonomous artificially intelligent agents want to be able to trust such agents -- that is, to know that these agents will perform correctly, to understand the reasoning behind their actions, and to know how to use them appropriately. Many techniques have been devised to assess and influence human trust in artificially intelligent agents. However, these approaches are typically ad hoc, and have not been formally related to each other or to formal trust models. This paper presents a survey of algorithmic assurances, i.e. programmed components of agent operation that are expressly designed to calibrate user trust in artificially intelligent agents. Algorithmic assurances are first formally defined and classified from the perspective of formally modeled human-artificially intelligent agent trust relationships. Building on these definitions, a synthesis of research across communities such as machine learning, human-computer interaction, robotics, e-commerce, and others reveals that assurance algorithms naturally fall along a spectrum in terms of their impact on an agent's core functionality, with seven notable classes ranging from integral assurances (which impact an agent's core functionality) to supplemental assurances (which have no direct effect on agent performance). Common approaches within each of these classes are identified and discussed; benefits and drawbacks of different approaches are also investigated.