# Individuals, Institutions, and Innovation in the Debates of the French Revolution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.06867 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.06867/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Abolitionist Networks: Modeling Language Change in Nineteenth-Century Activist Newspapers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07538/) (2021)
- [Semantics of European poetry is shaped by conservative forces: The relationship between poetic meter and meaning in accentual-syllabic verse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07148/) (2021)
- [Context is Key(NMF): Modelling Topical Information Dynamics in Chinese Diaspora Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12791/) (2024)
- [Locating the Leading Edge of Cultural Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15068/) (2024)
- [Trajectories of Change: Approaches for Tracking Knowledge Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00391/) (2024)
- [The Unfolding Structure of Arguments in Online Debates: The case of a No-Deal Brexit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16387/) (2021)
- [The Past as a Stochastic Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.05876/) (2021)
- [Tracking Discourse Influence in Darknet Forums](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02081/) (2022)
- [Tracing the Genealogies of Ideas with Large Language Model Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01661/) (2024)
- [topicwizard -- a Modern, Model-agnostic Framework for Topic Model Visualization and Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13034/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The French Revolution brought principles of "liberty, equality, and brotherhood" to bear on the day-to-day challenges of governing what was then the largest country in Europe. Its experiments provided a model for future revolutions and democracies across the globe, but this first modern revolution had no model to follow. Using reconstructed transcripts of debates held in the Revolution's first parliament, we present a quantitative analysis of how this system managed innovation. We use information theory to track the creation, transmission, and destruction of patterns of word-use across over 40,000 speeches and more than one thousand speakers. The parliament as a whole was biased toward the adoption of new patterns, but speakers' individual qualities could break these overall trends. Speakers on the left innovated at higher rates while speakers on the right acted, often successfully, to preserve prior patterns. Key players such as Robespierre (on the left) and Abb'e Maury (on the right) played information-processing roles emblematic of their politics. Newly-created organizational functions---such as the Assembly's President and committee chairs---had significant effects on debate outcomes, and a distinct transition appears mid-way through the parliament when committees, external to the debate process, gain new powers to "propose and dispose" to the body as a whole. Taken together, these quantitative results align with existing qualitative interpretations but also reveal crucial information-processing dynamics that have hitherto been overlooked. Great orators had the public's attention, but deputies (mostly on the political left) who mastered the committee system gained new powers to shape revolutionary legislation.