# Paraphrasing verbal metonymy through computational methods

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.06162 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06162/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [MetFuse: Figurative Fusion between Metonymy and Metaphor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12919/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Verbal metonymy has received relatively scarce attention in the field of computational linguistics despite the fact that a model to accurately paraphrase metonymy has applications both in academia and the technology sector. The method described in this paper makes use of data from the British National Corpus in order to create word vectors, find instances of verbal metonymy and generate potential paraphrases. Two different ways of creating word vectors are evaluated in this study: Continuous bag of words and Skip-grams. Skip-grams are found to outperform the Continuous bag of words approach. Furthermore, the Skip-gram model is found to operate with better-than-chance accuracy and there is a strong positive relationship (phi coefficient = 0.61) between the model's classification and human judgement of the ranked paraphrases. This study lends credence to the viability of modelling verbal metonymy through computational methods based on distributional semantics.