# An improvement of Tukey's HSD with application to ranking institutions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.02428 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.02428/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Prediction-Powered Ranking of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17826/) (2024)
- [Confident Feature Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15361/) (2023)
- [Rank Intervals for Leaderboards: A Hierarchical Framework for Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08679/) (2026)
- [Quantifying Ranking Uncertainty in LLM Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.16259/) (2026)
- [Rank Confidence Sequences:Anytime-valid Leaderboards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32211/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

When a ranking of institutions such as medical centers or universities is based on an indicator provided with a standard error, confidence intervals should be calculated to assess the quality of these ranks. We consider the problem of constructing simultaneous confidence intervals (CIs) for the ranks of centers based on an observed sample. We present a novel method based on Tukey's honest significant difference test (HSD) which is the first method to produce valid simultaneous CIs for ranks. Moreover, we introduce a new variant of Tukey's HSD based on the sequential rejection principle. The new algorithm ensures familywise error control, and produces simultaneous confidence intervals for the ranks uniformly shorter than those provided by Tukey's HSD for the same level of significance. We illustrate the method through both simulations and real data analysis from 64 hospitals in the Netherlands. Software for our new methods is available online in package textttICRanks downloadable from CRAN. Supplementary materials include supplementary R code for the simulations and proofs of the propositions presented in this paper.
