# Abstract Argumentation / Persuasion / Dynamics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10044 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.10044/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 29 May 2017.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Theme Aspect Argumentation Model for Handling Fallacies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15141/) (2022)
- [An action language-based formalisation of an abstract argumentation framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19625/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The act of persuasion, a key component in rhetoric argumentation, may be viewed as a dynamics modifier. We extend Dung's frameworks with acts of persuasion among agents, and consider interactions among attack, persuasion and defence that have been largely unheeded so far. We characterise basic notions of admissibilities in this framework, and show a way of enriching them through, effectively, CTL (computation tree logic) encoding, which also permits importation of the theoretical results known to the logic into our argumentation frameworks. Our aim is to complement the growing interest in coordination of static and dynamic argumentation.